TELS Community News
TELS director Marcia Linn and partner Ou Lydia Liu have been awarded a new National Science Foundation funded grant to investigate ways to use automated scoring of open-ended responses for student and teacher guidance, classroom assessments and eventually, high-stakes, consequential tests in Bay Area middle schools serving more than 4,000 diverse students.
To learn more about the CLASS project, you can view the proposal's executive summary, as well as press releases from the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Education and the Educational Testing Service (ETS).
The TELS Community seeks a new postdoctoral scholar to join the Cumulative Learning using Embedded Assessment Results (CLEAR) and Continuous Learning and Automated Scoring in Science (CLASS) projects. For more details and information on how to apply, see the position summary.
- It juxtaposes the failure of transmitting knowledge with the success of knowledge integration.
- It shows how modern, online learning environments can exploit powerful scientific visualizations and virtual experiments, amplify the effectiveness of teachers, assess students continuously as they learn, and guide students to become lifelong learners.
Offers students a synthesis of research on lectures, experiments, science visualizations, collaboration, and professional development; Prepares researchers to identify compelling research questions; Gives classroom teachers efficient strategies for applying the knowledge integration pattern and improving student outcomes; Helps test designers create knowledge integration items and rubrics; Shows curriculum designers how to create and refine materials that strengthen understanding; Guides software designers to use open-source authoring tools in the Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE); and Enables evaluators to align instruction, assessment, professional development, and school leadership using the knowledge integration framework.
FEATURESScience Learning and Instruction attacks the intuitive belief that transmitting information is key to learning. Many textbooks, lectures, and even some cookbook-like experiments fail because they are designed to transmit information rather than to help students develop scientific ideas they can use in their careers and lives.
The book challenges the idea that motivating features such as humorous anecdotes, classroom experiments, or competitive games are sufficient to promote coherent understanding. Many educational reforms focus on motivating students to pay attention but then transmit information rather than developing the ability to make sense of complex ideas.
The book argues that eliciting and building on the ideas that students bring to science class is essential for knowledge integration. Many programs aim to eradicate misconceptions and transmit accurate ideas rather than guiding students to sort out alternative ideas and critique the many persuasive messages they will encounter in their lives.
Science Learning and Instruction stresses that active learning (a feature of many educational reforms) is necessary but can only succeed when it enables students to build an identity as a science learner and to feel empowered to make sense of science.
For more details, see the TELS Publications page and Science Learning and Instruction at Amazon.com.The proposed study investigates students' understanding of the scientific concept of "force" in Turkey, China, Korea, Mexico, and the United States. The study will contribute to the resolution of a central controversy among researchers of conceptual change regarding the structure and coherence of students' science knowledge. The study will employ an analytic framework developed through ongoing research at ASU along with two other analytic frameworks representing the predominant theoretical positions in the field. The goal is to apply and extend the analytic framework to provide a topological perspective (i.e., identifying coherence at different levels of behavior) for examining the integration of elemental and theory-like perspectives simultaneously. The study will contribute to this important theoretical debate by integrating multiple levels of analysis, allowing more precise questions to be addressed about the nature of students' knowledge structures. This study will additionally clarify the role of methodological and semantic/cultural differences in the findings of researchers on opposing sides of the controversy. Finally, findings about differences in how students from Mexico and other countries think about science topics like force and motion, in comparison to US English-monolingual students (who are more frequently studied), will inform the development of curricula that better support the underserved diverse student populations in US classrooms.
